Mumbai:
The people at Tata Engineering do not fancy the phrase cost
cutting, for no other reason than that they see it as inadequate,
even misleading in their context. Cost erosion is the
preferred terminology at Indias largest automotive company,
simply because it better captures the breakthrough exercise
that has shaved more than Rs 600 crore off Tata Engineerings
expenses over the last two years. Whats cut can grow back;
whats eroded is gone forever.
The
cost-erosion initiative, which began in April 2000, is
arguably the most important element in a remarkable revival
that has seen Tata Engineering recover from a loss of
Rs 500 crore in the year ended March 2001 to a profit
of Rs 28 crore in the first quarter of 2002-03. A quality
improvement programme based on the Six Sigma model, and
the development of new products are the other components
of this revival, but it is in cost reduction that the
gains have come thickest and fastest.
Consider
the figures: Rs 296 crore in 2000-01 and Rs 332 crore
in 2001-02. Thats cost erosion and its big.
Tata
Engineerings earlier efforts to control costs resulted
in small benefits, largely limited to the cost of materials.
These benefits were cancelled out by inflationary price
increases and expenses incurred on adding new features
to vehicles or otherwise improving them. And the results
from the companys three operation centres, Pune, Jamshedpur
and Lucknow, were never uniform. There was no method to
secure the gains of any cost-cutting exercise.
This
did not matter too much then. The good times were rolling
and Tata Engineering made the best of the situation. From
1993 to 1997 the company grew 30 per cent a year. Revenues
sped from Rs 2,500 crore to over Rs 10,000 crore and the
operating margin soared to 16 per cent. The country was
booming, the economy was booming, the company was booming,
recalls Praveen P Kadle, executive director (finance and
corporate affairs). We were in a sellers market.
Then
came the collapse. It wasnt any one factor that fuelled
Tata Engineerings fall. The market for commercial vehicles,
the mainstay of the companys business, crumbled by almost
45 per cent at about the time Tata Engineering was spending
more than Rs 1,300 crore in expanding capacities in this
segment and improving its utility vehicles. The Indica
project, up and running by this time, squeezed a further
Rs 1,700 crore from the kitty.
Revenues
caved in as a consequence, sinking to Rs 6,637 crore in
March 1999, but Tata Engineerings troubles were far from
over. The cost of complying with new emission norms and
the increasing weight of competition added to the pressure
on the companys operating margin, which dropped to a
low of 7 per cent in March 2001. For the first time the
market, rather than Tata Engineering, was determining
the prices of our products, says Kadle.
Given
the depressed market conditions and no revenue growth,
the only way we could reduce our losses significantly
and return to profitability was by reducing costs, he
adds. We were forced to look beyond the 1 to 2 per cent
kind of cost reduction. What we needed was out-of-the-box
thinking. And thats what Tata Engineering got.
Prakash
M Telang, senior vice president (manufacturing), was designated
the cost-erosion champion and put in charge of the entire
initiative. Four specific areas were identified:
- direct
material costs (which constitute roughly 65 per cent
of all costs);
- variable
conversion costs (power, fuel, water, tools, etc);
- fixed
costs (labour, marketing, corporate expenses, plant
operations, research and development);
- financial
restructuring (working capital, debt restructuring,
balance sheet, etc).
Three-tiered teams members, leaders and champions
were set up at the plant level to implement, drive and
monitor the exercise across the organisation. Their task
began with spreading the cost-reduction message, emphasising
its importance to bringing the company back to good health,
and defining the methods to accomplish it. The companys
union was co-opted to communicate the programme and the
house journal did the same.
Everybody
had a cost-erosion target built into his area of work,
says Telang, and we saw a cascading effect take hold.
The
companys quality improvement project and its cost-reduction
exercise have run concurrently, and each has helped the
other. For one, its people understood that cutting costs
did not mean cutting corners. The same teams and the
same people were involved in both, so they were wearing
these two hats simultaneously. This led to many win-win
situations.
An
illustration of this was what happened when Tata Engineering
made major changes in some of its technologies. We were
using copper-brass radiators when a new technology allowed
us to use aluminium radiators, which give much better
performance. So the quality of the vehicle improved, and
since aluminium is much cheaper than copper and brass,
the costs went down.
The
big positive of the cost-erosion initiative goes beyond
the statistics of money saved. The crisis unified the
company like never before. We have emerged from this as
a much leaner and better organisation.
What
the exercise has done is institutionalise certain methods.
Our systems are now good enough to prevent any cost increases,
any regression from what we have achieved. Its not just
one person; the whole organisation is in on it, so we
can only go forward from here.
Cost
reduction is going to be a permanent feature of Tata Engineerings
agenda for the future, but the problem here is that the
going gets tougher on this score with every passing month,
because finding new costs to eliminate becomes ever more
difficult.
Meanwhile,
there are other things to consider: complexity management
(essentially, making fewer variants of a particular product
range); putting a comprehensive testing system in place;
increasing the scope for outsourcing; and giving e-procurement
a more conspicuous role in the order of priorities, with
projected savings of Rs 100 crore on online purchases
of Rs 1,500 crore over the next three years.
With
operating margins in its flagship commercial vehicle operations
now up at about 13 per cent, Tata Engineering can afford
to breathe easy. Where two years back it looked dark as
tar, the future now promises the rewards of a war that
seems well and truly won.
Courtesy:
www.tata.com
This
is the second part of the article on the turnaround at
Tata Engineering. The first, , focuses on the companys quality
improvement programme
Also
see
List
of reports on features
also see : Where
quality is king
|