Brain cancer kills more under-40s than other cancers: experts

01 Oct 2014

1

More under-40s have been dying of brain cancer than due to other cancers because of a lack of research, according to experts, the online edition of the Mirror reported.

The chances of survival for the 16,000 people diagnosed every year continued to be poor due to only 1 per cent of funding going to finding a cure.

According to Brain Tumour Research (BTR) £3.5 million a year was spent on the disease against £32 million on breast cancer.

According to BTR chief Sue Farrington Smith  there was a need for people to know that more and better funding into brain tumours could bring about better outcomes.

She said it was the biggest cancer killer of children and of people under the age 40, so not only parents lost their children from the cancer, children were also losing their parents.

Brain tumours had been the poor cousin of research.

Just 1 per cent of the national spend on cancer went to brain tumours even though they killed more children and adults under 40 than any other cancer, according to the BTR's latest National Research Funding report.

The report said, ''The improvements in survival for breast, leukaemia, bowel and prostate cancers is clearly linked to the relatively higher spend on research for these cancers, with breast receiving an average £32 million per annum over the last 12 years, leukaemia £27 million per annum, bowel £20 million per annum and prostate £14 million per annum, compared to just £3.5 million for brain cancer.''

Meanwhile, bodies like Cancer Research UK and the National Cancer Research Institute had been accused of ignoring brain tumours even though they claimed the lives of more children and adults under 40 than any other cancer, The Telegraph reported.

Health experts at Imperial College, Queen Mary, University of London and Plymouth and Portsmouth universities warn that treatments were lagging behind the huge advances seen in breast, lung and prostate cancers.

According to charity Brain Tumour Research, it would take 100 years for brain cancer to catch up current developments in other diseases.

According to Geoff Pilkington, professor of cellular and molecular neuro-oncology at the University of Portsmouth, the disease was very complex and the money had not been forthcoming.

He added, Cancer Research UK had noticeably moved away from some cancers towards others and brain, pancreatic and oesophageal remained fairly stuck.

He added, they all however, had very poor outcomes, they all significantly involved surgery as a key treatment and across all medical funding surgery had been left behind.

Latest articles

Anthropic’s revenue run-rate doubles in India in four months as Claude adoption surges

Anthropic’s revenue run-rate doubles in India in four months as Claude adoption surges

Alibaba launches Qwen3.5 as competition heats up in the 'agentic AI' race

Alibaba launches Qwen3.5 as competition heats up in the 'agentic AI' race

Big Tech loses billions as AI spending concerns weigh on valuations

Big Tech loses billions as AI spending concerns weigh on valuations

The analog antidote: why Americans are trading algorithms for physical media

The analog antidote: why Americans are trading algorithms for physical media

UK weighs faster defence spending hike toward 3% as security pressures mount

UK weighs faster defence spending hike toward 3% as security pressures mount

China opens market to 53 African nations in zero-tariff pivot

China opens market to 53 African nations in zero-tariff pivot

Modi’s rooftop solar push slows as lenders and states drag feet

Modi’s rooftop solar push slows as lenders and states drag feet

India hosts global AI summit as tech leaders gather in Delhi amid investment push

India hosts global AI summit as tech leaders gather in Delhi amid investment push

OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger joins OpenAI as personal-agent project moves to foundation

OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger joins OpenAI as personal-agent project moves to foundation