As mobile users continue to grapple with call drops, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India telecom on Friday said current norms are ''inefficient'' to provide any relief to consumers and it will finalise in two weeks its ''position'' in the wake of the Supreme Court quashing a penalty provision.
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) had put in place a new set of rules mandating telecom operators to pay Re1 for each dropped call, subject to maximum Rs3 per day, but this provision was quashed by the Supreme Court after telecom operators appealed against it (See: Trai suffers blow as SC strikes down call drop penalty).
''We are reviewing the situation internally as to what should be the way forward. Maybe in couple of weeks we should be able to come out with the position as to what can be done,'' Trai Chairman R S Sharma told PTI in an interview.
Terming the current norms as inefficient in providing relief to telecom consumers, he said, ''Trai had tried to notionally compense consumers for call drops. As you know, the regulation was challenged by TSPs (telecom service providers) before the High Court of Delhi where the regulation was upheld.
''However, we lost out in the Supreme Court. I think we have to find some solution to this situation. I don't have any solution at this moment.''
Unlike other sectors, he said, an average grievance of telecom consumers has certain peculiarities as the consumer base for mobile services in India is very large and the monetary value in most of grievances is relatively small, around Rs10-20.
''Hence an average consumer is not able to approach courts because the value is very low and even the cost of filing an affidavit will be more than the value of the complaint,'' Sharma said.
Consumers also cannot go to Trai because it cannot entertain individual complaints and if it receives them, it forwards them to the TSP concerned.
''He (consumer) can approach the Department of Telecom, but then they also do not have any pecuniary powers except through arbitration route provided in section 7B of the Indian Telegraph Act of 1885. Hence the DoT also merely forwards the complaints received by them to the concerned TSP,'' he said.
Trai issued a regulation in 2012, creating a grievance redressal mechanism which provides for establishment of such a system by TSPs. Hence the consumer is left with no option but to go the telecom operators.
Customer complaints are at present addressed by telecom operators at three level - customer care centre executive. In case the customer is not satisfied, he or she can go to the nodal officer, and then to appellate authority.
Sharma expressed dissatisfaction with the present mechanism to address consumer complaints.
''Even the appellate mechanism is also operated by the TSPs themselves, there are issues relating to conflict of interest.
''Hence, as of now, consumer grievance redressal is not really very effective,'' Sharma said.