CCI imposes penalty on 3 railway contractors for cartelisation

20 Jan 2017

1

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed penalties on three firms for bid rigging of tenders floated by Indian Railways for procurement of Brushless DC fans in 2013.

CCI passed the final order in a case taken up suo moto under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, based on information received from the Central Bureau of Investigation.

CCI has held that the firms had shared the market by way of allocation of tenders of Indian Railways for Brushless DC fans amongst themselves under an agreement / arrangement and indulged in bid rigging / collusive bidding in contravention of the various provisions of the Act.

CCI said the anti-competitive conduct of the firms has been established based on exchange of rates to be quoted in upcoming tenders amongst the errant firms, numerous calls amongst the key persons of these firms before and during the period of the tenders and admission by one of the firms which confirmed and revealed the existence and modus operandi of the cartel.

Accordingly, penalties of Rs2.09 crore, Rs62.37 lakh and Rs20.01 lakh were imposed on the firms, Western Electric and Trading Company, Pyramid Electronics and R Kanwar Electricals, respectively.

While imposing the penalty, CCI took into consideration all the relevant factors including the duration of the cartel, volume of the tender affected by the cartel and value thereof and decided to impose penalty on Pyramid Electronics and Western Electric and Trading Company calculated at 1.0 time of their profit respectively in the year 2012-13 and on R Kanwar Electricals at the rate of 3 per cent of its turnover for the year 2012-13.

Additionally, considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, penalty was also imposed on persons-in charge of the three firms, ie, Sandeep Goyal of Pyramid Electronics, Ashish Jain of R Kanwar Electricals and Ramesh Parchani of Western Electric and Trading Company at the rate of 10 per cent of the average of their income for the last three preceding financial years.

CCI had received an application under Section 46 of the Act read with Regulation 5 of the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 from  Pyramid Electronics. This application was received when the investigation in the matter was in progress and the report from the DG was pending. 

Considering the co-operation extended by Pyramid Electronics in conjunction with the value addition provided by it in establishing the existence of cartel and the stage at which it had approached CCI, it was granted 75 per cent reduction in the penalty than would otherwise have been imposed, had it not cooperated with the commission.

Accordingly, the penalty imposed on Pyramid Electronics was reduced to Rs15.59 lakh and penalty imposed on Sandeep Goyal was reduced to Rs11,648 only.

Business History Videos

History of hovercraft Part 3 | Industry study | Business History

History of hovercraft Part 3...

Today I shall talk a bit more about the military plans for ...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of hovercraft Part 2 | Industry study | Business History

History of hovercraft Part 2...

In this episode of our history of hovercraft, we shall exam...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of Hovercraft Part 1 | Industry study | Business History

History of Hovercraft Part 1...

If you’ve been a James Bond movie fan, you may recall seein...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of Trams in India | Industry study | Business History

History of Trams in India | ...

The video I am presenting to you is based on a script writt...

By Aniket Gupta | Presenter: Sheetal Gaikwad

view more
View details about the software product Informachine News Trackers