Corporate
India''s credit fundamentals remain strong after four
years of sustained improvement, according to CRISIL''s
analysis of the trends in its rating actions. CRISIL''s
modified credit ratio (MCR) for 2006-07 (refers to financial
year, April 1 to March 31) continues to be above 1 at
1.01; this is marginally below the level of 1.03 recorded
in 2005-06.
The
trend of improving credit quality in corporate India,
which started when an MCR greater than 1 was recorded
in 2003-04, continued in 2006-07, but with lesser momentum.
Given that CRISIL''s rated portfolio covers key sectors
of the Indian economy, and includes most of the top
players in each segment. CRISIL says the correlation
of its MCR with key economic indicators has been proven
over several years (see Box 1).
The
significant improvement in Indian companies'' financial
position over the last few years has been accompanied
by a new-found confidence among corporate managers,
resulting in a palpable increase in their risk appetite.
With a large number of companies either announcing,
or already in the process of implementing, large capacity
expansions or aggressive acquisitions, the key to maintaining
the current levels of credit quality depends on how
well the growth is managed, and in what way it is funded.
MCR
continues to decline
CRISIL''s MCR is defined as the ratio of upgrades plus
reaffirmations, to downgrades plus reaffirmations over
any given period. In 2006-07, CRISIL''s MCR for long-term
ratings decreased to 1.01, falling steadily from an
all-time high of 1.16 recorded in 2004-05 (see Chart
1). The MCR reflects five upgrades and three downgrades
in CRISIL''s long-term ratings portfolio , as against
nine upgrades and four downgrades in the previous financial
year. (See Annexure for CRISIL''s upgrades and downgrades
for long-term ratings in 2006-07.)

The
decline in CRISIL''s overall MCR reflects a slowdown
in the momentum of improving credit quality. This is
in line with CRISIL''s observations, in Ratings Round-Ups
published since October 2005, that corporate India will
find it increasingly difficult to improve its credit
quality.
Downgrade
rate remains low
Chart 2 depicts CRISIL''s long-term downgrade rate
defined as the ratio of total downgrades in long-term
ratings to outstanding long-term ratings which
continues to be low at 1.74 per cent. No CRISIL-rated
instrument has defaulted over the last 27 months, the
longest such period since 1995.

Outlook
distribution
Rating
outlooks, assigned by CRISIL since September 2003, have
proven to be reliable leading indicators of the likely
direction of rating movements. The proportion of positive
and negative outlooks also provides guidance on the
likely direction of credit quality.
As
on March 31, 2007, more than 96 per cent of CRISIL-rated
entities had stable outlooks, reflecting CRISIL''s view
that no major changes are expected in the credit profiles
of rated entities over the short to medium term (see
Chart 3). The remaining outlooks were equally distributed
on the positive and negative side.

Rating
watch
CRISIL places ratings on watch when an event of
significance has occurred which has the potential to
impact the rating, but the impact cannot be accurately
assessed at that time. As on March 31, 2007, CRISIL
had six ratings on watch (see Appendix 1). Five
of the ratings were under watch due to acquisitions/projects
that are large compared to the current size of operations.
Sectoral
view
CRISIL''s
rating portfolio consists of entities belonging to all
sectors of the Indian economy. CRISIL''s opinion on the
prospects for credit quality in the manufacturing, infrastructure,
and financial sectors are contained below. On the positive
side, the opinion factors in the strong improvement
in credit fundamentals across the corporate spectrum;
on the other hand, it also takes note of the increasing
risk appetite of corporate India, in an economic environment
characterised by increasing interest rates.
As
in earlier years, the manufacturing sector accounted
for the bulk of the rating actions during 2006-07, with
four upgrades and three downgrades. One financial sector
entity, BoB Housing Finance Ltd, was upgraded to ''AAA''
giving the financial sector an MCR of 1.02. There were
no upgrades or downgrades among companies in the infrastructure
sector, which resulted in a sectoral MCR of 1.00 for
the infrastructure sector during 2006-07. Chart 4 gives
the MCR trends in these three sectors.

Manufacturing
and infrastructure sectors: Large growth plans in an
increasing interest rate environment
The manufacturing sector has witnessed a steady improvement
in its financial profile, aided by four years of sustained
economic growth. This sustained improvement in financial
strength has encouraged a large number of companies
to announce very large expansion/acquisition plans.
The planned capacity expansions in some industries and
estimates of the capital expenditure involved are given
in Table 1.
Table
1: CRISIL''s estimates of outlay for planned capacity
expansions
|
Industry
|
Units
|
Current
Capacity pa
|
Capacity
pa in 2012
|
Percentage
increase expected
|
Additional
investment in Rs. Bn.
|
|
Steel
|
million
tonnes
|
40
|
110
|
175
|
1680
|
|
Petroleum
Refining
|
million
tonnes
|
125
|
200
|
60
|
1310
|
|
Cement
|
million
tonnes
|
150
|
240
|
60
|
390
|
|
Aluminium
|
million
tonnes
|
1
|
1.65
|
65
|
120
|
|
Electrical
power
|
Giga-watts
|
110
|
185
|
68
|
3000
|
|
Telecom
|
Million
subscribers
|
166
|
327
|
97
|
1230
|
|
Automobiles
Passenger cars/commercial vehicles and two wheelers
|
Million
units
|
13
|
19
|
46
|
450
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
8160
|
Source:
CRISIL ratings
Based
on the leverage normally used in projects in different
sectors, CRISIL estimates that the extent of debt funding
would be about Rs.6000 billion an amount much
larger than the total assets of the largest bank in
India today.
Apart
from these expansion plans, corporate India has also
displayed a growing appetite for inorganic growth. The
total acquisitions already made or announced during
2006 (refers to calendar year, January 1 to December
31) were Rs.4340 billion (see Table 2). In the
first two months of the current year, 80 additional
deals valued at over Rs.1000 billion have been announced.
Table
2: Acquisitions announced by corporate India
|
Type
of Acquisitions
|
2005
|
2006
|
|
No
Of Deals
|
Value
(Rs. bn)
|
No
Of Deals
|
Value
(Rs. bn)
|
|
Domestic
|
79
|
2,606
|
73
|
1,273
|
|
Foreign
|
77
|
1,330
|
114
|
3,067
|
|
Total
|
156
|
3,937
|
187
|
4,340
|
Source:
Media reports, CRISIL estimates
The
implications of these capital expenditure plans and
acquisitions are:
A
key risk, therefore, would be the funding pattern for
the planned growth; debt-funded growth in a regime of
high interest rates has the potential to adversely affect
the credit quality of corporate India over the medium
term. The extent to which this actually happens will
depend on the companies'' decisions to press ahead with
expansions, or defer them, in the light of macroeconomic
conditions. Hence, management attitude towards risk
will be a key driver of future credit quality. CRISIL
will continue its surveillance on its rated portfolios,
and take appropriate rating actions on any signs of
weakening in specific credits.
Financial
sector: Increasing interest rates herald a slowdown
The
increase in interest rates, as well as recent Reserve
Bank of India actions to reduce liquidity in the system,
will lead to a slowdown in credit growth. Banks will
find it difficult to pass on their increased cost of
funds as borrowers increasingly look at alternate sources,
such as overseas borrowing and convertible bonds. CRISIL
believes that the profitability of financial sector
entities may be affected, going forward. The increase
in interest rates may also lead to an increase in delinquencies,
especially in the retail portfolio of financial sector
entities; this is, however, unlikely to significantly
affect the credit profile of the entities, as a majority
of financial sector entity ratings will continue to
draw support from their parents. This support is derived
from the Government of India for public sector banks,
and from foreign parents in case of multinational banks
and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs).
Conclusion
Corporate
India has built a strong financial position based on
four years of sustained good performance. The confidence
that comes from such a strong position has increased
the risk appetite of company managements. CRISIL believes
that this increased risk appetite, combined with higher
interest rates, is likely to exert pressure on the credit
quality of Indian companies. Going forward, the MCR
may fall below one in the short term when the ratings
on watch gets resolved. In the medium term, CRISIL believes
that the ability to prudently manage large growth plans,
and their funding patterns, will be the key rating driver
for a large number of companies.
Box
1: CRISIL MCR has strong correlation with IIP and real
interest rates
Strong
correlation with IIP
CRISIL''s
MCR is a sensitive measure of industrial performance
and the prospects of the Indian economy, as it covers
a wide range of sectors and key players in each sector.
This is reflected in the consistently high degree of
correlation between CRISIL''s MCR and India''s Index of
Industrial Production (IIP) as shown in Chart 5.

Real
interest rates and MCR
Real
interest rates and CRISIL''s MCR have historically demonstrated
a perfect inverse correlation - MCR declines when real
interest rates rise and vice-versa as can be observed
from Chart 6. The last 24 months have seen an increase
in real interest rates mirrored by a declining MCR.
High real interest rates, which are not expected to
decline in the near term, will add to credit quality
pressures.

Appendix
- I
| CRISIL''s
Long-Term Rating Upgrades in the Financial Year
2006-07 |
|
Sr.No
|
Company
|
Industry
|
Rating
From
|
Outlook
From
|
Rating
To
|
Outlook
To
|
|
1
|
BoB
Housing Finance Limited
|
Housing
Finance
|
AA+
|
Positive
|
AAA
|
Stable
|
|
2
|
DCM
Shriram Industries
|
Organic
Chemicals
|
D
|
-
|
BBB-
|
Stable
|
|
3
|
Jagran
Prakashan Limited
|
Printing
and Publishing
|
AA-
|
Positive
|
AA
|
Stable
|
|
4
|
NIIT
Technologies Limited
|
IT
Services
|
AA-
|
Stable
|
AA
|
Stable
|
|
5
|
Titan
Industries Limited
|
Watches
and Clocks
|
A
|
Stable
|
A+
|
Stable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRISIL''s
Long-Term Rating Downgrades in the Financial Year
2006-07
|
|
Sr.No
|
Company
|
Industry
|
Rating
From
|
Outlook
From
|
Rating
To
|
Outlook
To
|
|
1
|
India
Glycols Limited
|
Organic
Chemicals
|
AA-
|
Stable
|
A+
|
Negative
|
|
2
|
Insilco
Limited
|
Industrial
Intermediary
|
AA-
|
*
|
A+
|
Stable
|
|
3
|
Madras
Cements Limited
|
Cement
|
AA-
|
Stable
|
A+
|
Stable
|
|
|
*
Insilco Limited was on AA- Rating Watch and was
subsequently downgraded on 19-09-2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRISIL''s
Fixed Deposit Ratings Upgrades in the Financial
Year 2006-07
|
|
Sr.No
|
Company
|
Industry
|
Rating
From
|
Outlook
From
|
Rating
To
|
Outlook
To
|
|
1
|
Kirloskar
Brothers Limited
|
Engineering
|
FAA
|
-
|
FAA+
|
Positive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRISIL''s
Fixed Deposit Ratings Downgrades in the Financial
Year 2006-07
|
|
Sr.No
|
Company
|
Industry
|
Rating
From
|
Outlook
From
|
Rating
To
|
Outlook
To
|
|
1
|
Fenner
India Limited
|
Automobile
Ancillary and Engineering
|
FAA
|
-
|
FAA-
|
Stable
|
|
2
|
India
Glycols Limited
|
Organic
Chemicals
|
FAA
|
Stable
|
FAA-
|
Negative
|
|
3
|
Madras
Cements Limited
|
Cement
|
FAA
|
Stable
|
FAA-
|
Stable
|
|
CRISIL''s
Rating Watch as on 31st March 2007
|
|
Sr.No
|
Company
|
Industry
|
Rating
|
Watch
|
|
1
|
Lanco
Kondapalli Power Private Ltd
|
Power
|
A
|
Rating
Watch (Developing Implications)
|
|
2
|
Torrent
Power AEC Limited
|
Power
|
AA-/FAA
|
Rating
Watch (Developing Implications)
|
|
3
|
Tata
Power Company Limited
|
Power
|
AAA
|
Rating
Watch (Developing Implications)
|
|
4
|
Essel
Mining and Industries Ltd
|
Mining
|
AA
|
Rating
Watch (Negative Implication)
|
|
5
|
Hindalco
Industries Limited
|
Aluminium
|
AAA
|
Rating
Watch (Negative Implication)
|
|
6
|
Tata
Steel Limited
|
Steel
|
AAA/FAAA
|
Rating
Watch (Negative Implication)
|