Chennai:
In addition to the normal credit rating, insurers in the US and
other western countries are now opting for financial enhancement
ratings (FER) introduced by Standard & Poors (S&P) in
mid-2000.
FER was designed to show and clarify to capital markets
not only how able, but also how willing and likely insurers
are to pay claims that they have received, and thereby
to show investors that a given bond or transaction is
truly enhanced.
FER ratings give
capital markets an indication of an insurance companys
willingness to pay on structured transactions wrapped by the
insurer, says S&P Insurance Rating Group managing director
Bob Mebus. This is especially relevant now given the degree of
uncertainty associated with insurance companies willingness to
pay quickly and with the rise in the complexity of structured
transactions.
Today, when structured
financial transactions and guarantees are becoming more and more
complex, some insurance companies are now providing transparency
and a willingness to pay claims as a value-added benefit for their
investors. This is the trend now among insurance companies that
offer credit enhancement underwritten through an insurance policy
where the insurer accepts specified transaction risks, which
affect the financial performance of a transaction.
What is credit
enhancement? Consider this. A municipal authority is selling a
bond for a bridge somewhere in the US. The municipal bond, on its
own, may be rated rather low, but the issuer may purchase
financial guarantee insurance on the bond from a higher rated
insurance company. This acts as a guaranty in that the insurance
company then takes on some of the risk and in a sense, lends its
rating to the municipal bond.
These types of
transactions were the domains of mono-line bond insurers, who paid
claims immediately when called upon. But as the complexity of
transactions increased, multi-line insurers entered the fray.
These new entrants looks at claims on a denied-first basis and may
not always be prepared to settle claims as readily as the investor
and bond issuer may believe.
Often it is only those
close to the insurance industry are in the know that insurance
companies approach claims with a denied-until-proven-otherwise
manner, as opposed to a pay-first-no-matter-what basis, says
Mebus. So the actual enhancement of the bonds rating may be
misrepresented in borrowing the insurance companys
own financial strength rating, depending on the willingness of the
insurer to pay claims on such transactions. Insurers financial
strength ratings do not take willingness to pay into account.
If the bridge has a
problem, and the insurance company denies the claim, or takes a
long time to pay out, then the bond really is not enhanced at
all. For the credit support supplied by insurers, as with other
types of guarantors, capital markets want a high degree of
assurance, that their claims will be paid
if it comes to it, sums up Mebus.
|