|
Life
insurance companies come together to form a self regulatory organisation.
By Venkatchari Jagannathan. The
Life Insurance Council has started with a bang. After its stormy first meeting
at Mumbai, the council's recommendation to Insurance Regulatory and Development
Authority (IRDA) to permit only term insurance cover for keyman insurance
policy has been accepted. It may be recalled the policy was being misused
to avoid tax and a couple of life insurers were mentioned as offenders.
The meeting
also decided to form a market conduct committee to monitory the marketing
practices of the players. However,
the council's secretary general S V Mony, terming the first meetingas healthy,
said, "The discussions were healthy and the decision was unanimous.
Further sub-committees are important for the functioning of any organisation.
We will be forming several sub committees to look at various issues. On
the whole we want the life insurance council to be the life insurance industry's
self regulatory organisation." Constituted
under Section 64A of the Insurance Act 1938 the council will function through
an executive committee. "Today, the council is a small organisation.
We are in the process of forming the executive council." According
to the Act, the executive committee of the council would assist insurers
in setting up standards of conduct and practice, customer service, advise
IRDA on controlling insurers' expenses, bring to the IRDA's attention matters
relating to any non-complying insurer. "We
are also expected to take over the functions relating to training of agents,
approval of agents training institutions." Presently the matters relating
to the training institutes for agents and agents training are looked after
by IRDA. The
council has also signed an MOU with the Actuarial Society of India (ASI)
to form the Mortality and Morbidity Investigation Bureau. The basic objective
is to study the recent trends in, and acquiring more data on information
on, mortality, morbidity and other specific risk related contingencies in
life insurance. A joint venture company will be formed for the purpose. Mony
(67) vice chairman, AMP Sanmar Assurance Company Limited and the former
chairman, General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) will hold this post
for two years and he talks about the role that the council would play. Excerpts.
Is
the council going to be a lobby body for the life insurers?
The council is certainly not a lobby body but the industry's self regulatory
body. In addition the industry needs a forum to act as the voice of life
insurers and be its spokesperson to communicate members' position on policy
issues to government, legislature, regulatory and the public. The
council will help IRDA to increase the insurance awareness amongst the masses
and also build the industry's image through seminars, etc. Not many know
that the life insurance industry manages around Rs5,00,000 crore. The
council's vision is to play a significant and complementary role in transforming
the domestic life insurance industry into a vibrant, trustworthy and profitable
service, ushering the people of India on their journey to prosperity. The
mission is to act as an active forum to aid, advise and assist insurers
in maintaining high standards of conduct and service to policyholders. Will
the life insurers pay some percentage of their total premium to raise resources
for the council?
As of now the council is a small body. We are in the process of formulating
its budget. All the life insurers will share the councils' expenditure equally.
The cess will not be a share of the life insurer's premium. One
of the reasons for opening the industry to private participation was to
increase the insurance penetration in rural markets. But that has not happened
as the private players sell just ULIP particularly in the metros.
During the past one or two year's private players have expanded their distribution
network to rural areas. The spread will be faster in the years to come.
Incidentally ULIP is a popular product even in smaller towns. As
the industry's self regulating body, what is the council's response to complaints
against ULIP?
We have addressed one complaint relating to the keyman insurance policy.
A life insurer can issue only term insurance for keyman insurance cover.
The other criticism about ULIP is the negligible life cover provided under
some schemes. The council will soon draft the norms relating to this and
recommend the same to IRDA. Life
insurers are accused of promoting ULIP to pick up big ticket policies reduce
additional capital infusion and shift the investment risk to the policyholders
while reaping higher percentage of share in the surplus. Your comment.
Even traditional insurance covers bring in big sized policies. Similarly
the infusion of additional capital to meet the solvency norms is a function
of formula that takes into account the policy size as well as the insurer's
probable liability. So it is not right to say the ULIP requires
lower reserving requirements. I will agree that the investment risk under
ULIP is shifted to the policyholder. But ULIP is an outcome of demand for
transparency.
|