|
No
longer can one say that a life insurance policy helps in tax breaks.
Its the other way round: buying a life insurance policy and still
pay tax.
With one single stroke,
Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha has proposed to raise more than Rs
2,500 crore by bringing the life insurance sector under the 5-per cent
service tax dragnet, till now an exempted industry. Sinha has also
included life insurance auxiliary services under the service tax
net. And the government hopes to collect a sizeable kitty year
after year.
For instance, the Life
Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is likely to close this fiscal
with a total premium income of Rs 50,000 crore and 5 per cent on this
works out to whopping Rs 2,500 crore. In addition, there are several
new private life insurers whose premium income will also be subject to
service tax.
Says LIC acting CMD A
Ramamurthy: "The provisions related to the proposed tax measure
are not clear. Whether the tax should be charged on the total premium
or only on the risk portion of the premium, and whether the tax should
be charged on fresh business or even on renewal premium are to be
clarified."
Even if the tax is to be
levied on the first year premium alone, the government will amass not
less than Rs 700 crore, as LICs first-year premium is around Rs
14,000 crore. And the government collects nearly Rs 500 crore from the
general insurance industry through this route.
Sinhas move has caught the
new private players completely by surprise. "It is double-whammy
for policyholders. On the one hand some tax breaks have been withdrawn
under section 88 for some categories, and on the other hand a new tax
is levied," says Birla Sun Life
Insurance CEO Nani B Javeri. Concurring with him, an AMP Sanmar
Assurance official says: "For the private sector this is a new
industry and we did not expect a tax on our services."
Curiously, all the new
insurers are of the view that a life insurance policy should not be
sold only as a tax-saving instrument. "It is advantageous to take
a policy before this March than buying the same next fiscal,"
suggests Ramamurthy.
|